Site Announcements

View the results of the New Wave Outpost 20th Anniversary Top Songs Poll here:
http://www.nwoutpost.com/poll/results


Coming Soon: Top Albums Poll. Stay tuned!

Welcome to the new forum!
If you are a previously registered user, you must do the following:

1) Click on 'I forgot my password' at the login prompt
2) Enter your username and email you registered with and submit
3) You will receive an email with an activation link. Please click it and then log in using the random password provided
4) Go to your User Control Panel and click on the Profile tab
5) Click on 'Edit Account Settings' and enter your new password twice followed by the random password provided earlier. Click Submit.
6) That's it...you're back in! You may have to log in again with your new password.


If you forgot your email address, please email me (MikeP) at: mikepaulsen12@gmail.com

Note: you must now use bb code buttons in the Post form for embedded images, YouTube videos, etc.
For example, to post embedded YouTube videos: paste in the link (e.g., http://www.youtube.com/watch?XYZ1234567), highlight it and then click the YouTube button.

Nine Inch Nails not from masters says Trent...


Nine Inch Nails not from masters says Trent...

Postby ApolloZero » Fri Jul 22, 2011 5:34 am

I thought this tidbit was interesting:

It usually pains me to agree with Nine Inch Nails honcho Trent Reznor – the musician who rallied so hard against the superficiality of the Grammys had no problem picking up an Oscar for the score to The Social Network last year – but his latest cause is a particularly worthy one. The musician took to Twitter to urge fans not to buy a recent reissue of Pretty Hate Machine that Universal put out. The set was not sourced from the remastered tapes which were released through UMe last year, nor did the bonus track on said remaster appear. Look, maybe I’m just naive, but what does a label stand to gain from reissuing a catalogue album so soon after re-releasing it in the first place?
ApolloZero
The Jet Set
 
Posts: 719
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 1:48 am
Location: USA

Postby humanracer » Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:54 am

Perhaps but nine times out of ten, a reissue of the original masters is much better than any remaster. Most remasters now are loud, compressed rubbish.
humanracer
The Jet Set
 
Posts: 670
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 7:19 am
Location: Fife, Scotland

Postby roc51 » Sun Jul 24, 2011 10:11 am

[quote]Originally posted by ApolloZero
[br]I thought this tidbit was interesting:

It usually pains me to agree with Nine Inch Nails honcho Trent Reznor – the musician who rallied so hard against the superficiality of the Grammys had no problem picking up an Oscar for the score to The Social Network last year – but his latest cause is a particularly worthy one. The musician took to Twitter to urge fans not to buy a recent reissue of Pretty Hate Machine that Universal put out. The set was not sourced from the remastered tapes which were released through UMe last year, nor did the bonus track on said remaster appear. Look, maybe I’m just naive, but what does a label stand to gain from reissuing a catalogue album so soon after re-releasing it in the first place?
[/quote]

OK, so how do you get the proper remastered one?
roc51
Personal Jesus
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 6:42 am
Location: Australia


Return to News, Reissues & Compilations

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests