Site Announcements
Congratulations to
edaseqwiinta


View the results of the New Wave Outpost 20th Anniversary Top Songs Poll here:
http://www.nwoutpost.com/poll/results


Coming Soon: Top Albums Poll. Stay tuned!

Welcome to the new forum!
If you are a previously registered user, you must do the following:

1) Click on 'I forgot my password' at the login prompt
2) Enter your username and email you registered with and submit
3) You will receive an email with an activation link. Please click it and then log in using the random password provided
4) Go to your User Control Panel and click on the Profile tab
5) Click on 'Edit Account Settings' and enter your new password twice followed by the random password provided earlier. Click Submit.
6) That's it...you're back in! You may have to log in again with your new password.


If you forgot your email address, please email me (MikeP) at: mikepaulsen12@gmail.com

Note: you must now use bb code buttons in the Post form for embedded images, YouTube videos, etc.
For example, to post embedded YouTube videos: paste in the link (e.g., http://www.youtube.com/watch?XYZ1234567), highlight it and then click the YouTube button.

Another New Wave or Not New Wave survey

New Wave/Punk music, culture, genres, memories. '80s revivalism and other relevant topics.

Postby schwenko » Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:15 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by beatschool[/i]
<br>I have a pretty narrow personal definition of what qualifies as New Wave, but I would definitely include late 70s/early 80s Crenshaw, Costello, Lowe, etc. simply because my group of friends listened to them. Any bands that I define as strictly New Wave faded to obscurity/went underground/folded when New Wave radio stations began disappearing and there wasn't really a wave to speak of anymore.

Who was the dingbat that kept claiming that Kylie Minogue was New Wave because she had been produced by Stock/Aitken/Waterman? That dude really had no clue about New Wave.
[/quote]

http://www.nwoutpost.com/forum/topic.as ... ms=minogue
schwenko
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 5392
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 12:20 pm
Location: USA

Postby eight6 » Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:15 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by ekahob[/i]

Do you like the bands? Great! Enjoy them no matter what label anybody tries to put on them.

[/quote]

Thank you, thank you, thank you!!! Instead of trying to pidgeonhole the music, just enjoy it. Almost every group/artist's music evolves...trying to put a static label on it is pointless.

<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v647/dbince/eight.gif"><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v647/dbince/number6.gif">

I was smellin' alright, and lookin' alright.
User avatar
eight6
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 5807
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 5:06 am
Location:

Postby beatschool » Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:30 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by schwenko[/i]
<br>[quote][i]Originally posted by beatschool[/i]
<br>I have a pretty narrow personal definition of what qualifies as New Wave, but I would definitely include late 70s/early 80s Crenshaw, Costello, Lowe, etc. simply because my group of friends listened to them. Any bands that I define as strictly New Wave faded to obscurity/went underground/folded when New Wave radio stations began disappearing and there wasn't really a wave to speak of anymore.

Who was the dingbat that kept claiming that Kylie Minogue was New Wave because she had been produced by Stock/Aitken/Waterman? That dude really had no clue about New Wave.
[/quote]

http://www.nwoutpost.com/forum/topic.as ... ms=minogue
[/quote]

TY.
beatschool
The Jet Set
 
Posts: 754
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 8:02 pm
Location:

Postby hexicon » Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:16 am

I like Ekahob's point about listening to what you like but I must say that I agree with Swamp Thing's intial post--probably because I listened to the same stations he did (KZAM and KYYX). I considered all those artists NW back in the day and I still do.

The local hard rock station, KISW, played Costello and the Clash ca. 1978-79, and I just remember how incredibly *different* they sounded--spare and stripped down, the DIY ethic Ekahob mentions.
hexicon
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1192
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 12:58 pm
Location: USA

Postby WolverineSyr » Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:00 pm

All are new wave to me. I was around in the late 70's those guys were different than the mainstream.

Just because new wave became a genre played by sourpuss, chinless, sweater boys doodling around a keyboard in the mid-80s doesn't erase the fact that there was great guitar based new wave beforehand.
WolverineSyr
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 4852
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:50 am
Location: USA

Postby schwenko » Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:14 pm

[quote][i]Originally posted by WolverineSyr[/i]
<br>All are new wave to me. I was around in the late 70's those guys were different than the mainstream.

Just because new wave became a genre played by sourpuss, chinless, sweater boys doodling around a keyboard in the mid-80s doesn't erase the fact that there was great guitar based new wave beforehand.
[/quote]

I agree, but you are not considering this pearl of wisdom

"I suppose that in the 70's many bands were called new wave just because they had a different sound but with the introduction of synth based bands and later guitar based bands, New Wave has redefined its boundaries excluding therefore the so called new wave bands of the early years."

[:D][:D][:D][:D]
schwenko
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 5392
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 12:20 pm
Location: USA

Postby WolverineSyr » Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:20 pm

[quote][i]Originally posted by schwenko[/i]

I agree, but you are not considering this pearl of wisdom

[/quote]

Well with that line of thinking, Chuck Berry & Elvis are no longer considered Rock & Roll, because the Beatles came along, but they are no longer Rock & Roll either because Led Zep came along...but then came arena rock of the 70's, but forget that because something voided that, which then redefined its boundaries excluding therefore the so called Rock & Roll.[;)]
WolverineSyr
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 4852
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:50 am
Location: USA

Postby Moparmark » Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:31 pm

I never did understand how Nick Lowe(pub/country rock),Declan McManus
ex folkie and Graham Parker(political rocker) ever got the new wave tag anyway.
Moparmark
The Jet Set
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Canada

Postby zill » Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:24 pm

I was looking forward to reading this thread because I've been listening to Marshall Crenshaw a bit lately. I'm still on the fence since it sounds a little too close to the "new country" my dad (!) listens to today.

Anyway, f's response is the funniest thing I've read here for awhile!
zill
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 2130
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 4:29 am
Location: Canada

Postby TragicMagic » Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:41 pm

Ok.. so.. I have a question:

Is Neil Diamond new wave or not?


[:D]

TM
TragicMagic
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1154
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 4:47 pm
Location: Australia

Postby i_like_lectric_motors » Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:25 pm

[quote][i]Originally posted by Randall Roq[/i]
<br>Clearly people responding here are confusing what New Wave was compared to what it became.

Back in the day (the late 70's) Elvis Costello and Joe Jackson would easily qualify as New Wave. But to many folks nowadays New Wave has come to mean synths, electronics and day glo. That didn't come into the scene till much later (Early 80's).


[/quote]

Exactly. Everyone Swampthing listed was considered new wave then and still should be now.

It shouldn't matter what genres the artists bramched out into later in their careers.

-------
Results:
Too much damage done. Go away. [78%] 63 votes
Yah! Kimiiii is back! Hip hip hooray! [22%] 18 votes
i_like_lectric_motors
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 6332
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 1:38 pm
Location: Vatican City

Postby skinnytie » Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:54 pm

Out of the 5 performers SwampThing listed, I would list them all as new wave with the slight possible exception of Marshall Crenshaw (he was always one of those performers who was borderline to me). Even though Nick Lowe was making music in the late 60's and early 70's, I still classify him as new wave; it was my first exposure to him, and hey, he was on the Stiff label! [:)] Most of the performers SwampThing listed came out of the whole British Pub Rock era, where a number of the future new wave acts would come from.

The first thread I EVER started here was about Dave Edmunds. The first response to my first thread was pretty much of a "oh, he's not new wave, why are you discussing him here" attitude. I dunno; new wave or not, I consider him part of the whole thing.
skinnytie
The Jet Set
 
Posts: 997
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 12:45 pm
Location: USA

Postby Bitter Almonds » Fri Oct 27, 2006 2:00 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by eight6[/i]
<br>[quote][i]Originally posted by fanciz[/i]
<br>Hey Swampie, U are so funny! So according to you, any artist played on your station was automatically a new wave artist eheheheheh The fact is that New Wave is a world-wide phenomenon and considering that the bulk of new wave bands came from the UK, Australia, Germany etc, it is of no interest for new wavers to know that some bands were played on American stations or not. Those stations have never been a reference since most new wave bands didn't make it to the US in the first place. Going back to your question, I don't think that those artists deserve the New Wave tag. There used to be a debate as to whether Elvis Costello was punk or New Wave but personally I always thought that he was more punk than anything else. To be fair, I would say that some local new wave stations played Pump It Up and Veronica and a few songs of Joe Jackson like Steppin'Out and Breaking Us In Two, but they appeared in the playlists as guest artists rather than new wave artists.

http://de.music.yahoo.com/launchcast/st ... 1249492395
[/quote]

LOL!!! Swampthing could only hope to be as funny as you are! What a perfectly crafted turd you've posted. [i]"The fact is that New Wave is a world-wide phenomenon and considering that the bulk of new wave bands came from the UK, Australia, Germany etc, it is of no interest for new wavers to know that some bands were played on American stations or not."[/i]...if you're not French by birth, you deserve citizenship: the arrogance of this statement is worthy of a Frenchman.

Again, LOL!!!

<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v647/dbince/eight.gif"><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v647/dbince/number6.gif">

I was smellin' alright, and lookin' alright.
[/quote]

<p align="justify">The only time I read fanciz's comments is when you quote them[:D] Hahaha. That shit writes itself!

For the original question, without a doubt, these kids were New Wave or had New Wave songs. What's ironic is that while I think of Marshall Crenshaw as "New Wave" (same as Stray Cats), I don't file Chris Isaak in the same bin!
Bitter Almonds
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 3767
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 5:27 am
Location: USA

Postby djcraig » Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:25 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by TragicMagic[/i]
<br>Ok.. so.. I have a question:

Is Neil Diamond new wave or not?
[/quote]

Nah, he was more Punk.

Those early incarnations of "Sweet Caroline" used to inspire hysterical crowd moshing before he toned it down...



<img src="http://www.recordresearch.com/Album_Photos/images/Diamond_Neil.jpg">
"Sod off ya wankers!"
-Neil (Sex Pistol) Diamond



<a href= http://

<a href="http://www.djcraig.net/">DJ Craig</a>
djcraig
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 3703
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:28 am
Location:

Postby empyrean » Thu Nov 02, 2006 3:19 pm

On my part, Elvis Costello is New Wave. ( my fave The Other Side Of Summer ). The others, i dont think so. [:D]
empyrean
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1166
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 3:54 pm
Location: Trinidad and Tobago

Previous

Return to General New Wave & '80s Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests