by Bitter Almonds » Fri Jan 13, 2006 7:17 am
[quote][i]Originally posted by korova1[/i]
<br>OK, I have to say something here. My one post for this month, I guess... because this is my band we are talking about and I can't believe I have to argue this point but here goes...
Sonic Youth will be just as significant (or more significant in some opinions) as U2 in the history of popular music, but for completely different reasons. Just because supposedly "nobody is listening" doesn't mean they won't be in 15 years when people finally catch up to the music. Don't generalize about a band when you obviously don't know jack **it about 'em. Sonic Youth not only changed the way many people listen to music but along with Birthday Party, Swans and Neubauten they changed the way people can appreciate more complex and atonal types of compositions.
A great example of other artists who did their own thing and made huge waves in the future are artists like The Velvet Underground or Nick Drake... NOBODY listened to them in the 60's but now they are on EVERYBODY'S list as some of the most important bands of that era of music. The Velvet Underground influenced both Peter Buck and the Edge's guitar playing early on and Michael Stipe's songwriting. But using your logic here: "since VU wasn't as popular as the Beatles or the Stones than I guess that makes them irrelevant". In the latest Rolling Stone (or was it Time or was it Newsweek... aww who cares) Bono regards Lou Reed who happened to bethe singer-songwriter for Velvet Underground as the reason for starting up a band in the late 70's in the first place.
SY isn't a "tree falling alone in a forest", rather they are an acorn that starts the forest. They've probably influenced just as many bands (or more) than U2 has in the years they've been around: from Yeah Yeah Yeah's to Fugazi to Nirvana to Dinosaur Jr. to Mars Volta to the Flaming Lips to Wilco to almost any band that uses alternate tunings on the charts in the year 2006.
Don't judge a band by how many records they sell because it is a close minded approach to listening or enjoying music. That is why NWO exists in the first place, because the people on these boards like music that is left of center.
There aren't too many bands that make compelling music for more than 10 years let alone 20...but both the Fall and Sonic Youth have managed to do it. Hell, in inteviews even members of REM and U2 have admitted to having Fall and Sonic Youth albums in their collections!!! Then to say Kraftwerk is a "two hit wonder" is just absolutely friggin' hilarious. In one way or another they influenced every synth-pop-new-wave-post-punk band that came down the pike since 1975. Siouxsie, John Lydon, New Order, Bowie, and U2 included... even in early 2006 (the current "U2")Coldplay's latest HOT 100 single "Talk" lifts a coda right out of "Computer Love" by Kraftwerk.
That said, after all these years I guess I just didn't know it had to be on the Billboard charts in order for it to be culturally relevant! What is "buzz" anyway... bands like The Fall and Sonic Youth defy "buzz" and in my opinion have ALREADY lasted longer artistically than both REM and U2. The Fall's latest, "Fall Heads Roll" and Sonic Youth's "Sonic Nurse" are both incredible albums.
Anyway to get back to the topic, REM left the building in 1986. U2 started to get crispy around the edges on a little album called "POP", probably the biggest piece of crap album by a major artist in the last 20 years. Right now people are just happy with U2 not making anything as bad as that little platter of brown matter... but they forget that U2 did it a couple of years before "POP" with "Rattle and Hum"!! Trust me, it will be just a matter of time until they do it again... "Discoteque" anyone!?!?
[/quote]
DRS...
Right on, dude.